Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Philosophies and Methodologies for Knowledge Discovery
Guest editors: E. Vityaevx and K. Rennollsy
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Pechenizkiy, Mykolaa; * | Puuronen, Seppob | Tsymbal, Alexeyc
Affiliations: [a] Department of Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands | [b] Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, Jyväskylä 40351, Finland | [c] Siemens AG, CT SE SCR 2, Erlangen, Germany | [x] Institute of Mathematics, Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia | [y] School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. E-mail: m.pechenizkiy@tue.nl.
Abstract: Data mining (DM) research has successfully developed advanced DM techniques and algorithms over the last few decades, and many organisations have great expectations to take more benefit of their data warehouses in decision making. Currently, the strong focus of most DM-researchers is still only on technology-oriented topics. Commonly the DM research has several stakeholders, the major of which can be divided into internal and external ones each having their own point of view, and which are at least partly conflicting. The most important internal groups of stakeholders are the DM research community and academics in other disciplines. The most important external stakeholder groups are managers and domain experts who have their own utility-based interests to DM and DM research results. In this paper we discuss these practice-oriented points of view towards DM research and suggest broader discussions inside the DM research community about who should do that kind of research. We bring in the discussion several topics developed in the information systems (IS) discipline and show some similarities between IS and DM systems. DM systems have also their own peculiarities and we conclude that researchers who take into account human and organisational aspects related to DM systems need to have also some understanding about DM. This makes us suggest that the research area inside the DM community should be made broader than the current heavily technology-oriented one.
Keywords: Rigor vs. relevance in research, utility-based data mining, data mining stakeholders
DOI: 10.3233/IDA-2008-12206
Journal: Intelligent Data Analysis, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 237-249, 2008
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl