Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Selection of papers from the 21st EANN (Engineering Applications of Neural Networks) and 16th AIAI (Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations) Joint International Conference
Guest editors: Lazaros Iliadis
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Schwan, Constanze | Schenck, Wolfram*
Affiliations: Center for Applied Data Science (CfADS), Faculty of Engineering and Mathematics, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Gütersloh, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Wolfram Schenck, Center for Applied Data Science (CfADS), Faculty of Engineering and Mathematics, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Schulstraße 10, 33330 Gütersloh, Germany. E-mail: wolfram.schenck@fh-bielefeld.de.
Abstract: Robotic grasping in dynamic environments is still one of the main challenges in automation tasks. Advances in deep learning methods and computational power suggest that the problem of robotic grasping can be solved by using a huge amount of training data and deep networks. Despite these huge accomplishments, the acceptance and usage in real-world scenarios is still limited. This is mainly due to the fact that the collection of the training data is expensive, and that the trained network is a black box. While the collection of the training data can sometimes be facilitated by carrying it out in simulation, the trained networks, however, remain a black box. In this study, a three-step model is presented that profits both from the advantages of using a simulation approach and deep neural networks to identify and evaluate grasp points. In addition, it even offers an explanation for failed grasp attempts. The first step is to find all grasp points where the gripper can be lowered onto the table without colliding with the object. The second step is to determine, for the grasp points and gripper parameters from the first step, how the object moves while the gripper is closed. Finally, in the third step, for all grasp points from the second step, it is predicted whether the object slips out of the gripper during lifting. By this simplification, it is possible to understand for each grasp point why it is stable and – just as important – why others are unstable or not feasible. All of the models employed in each of the three steps and the resulting Overall Model are evaluated. The predicted grasp points from the Overall Model are compared to the grasp points determined analytically by a force-closure algorithm, to validate the stability of the predicted grasps.
Keywords: Robotic grasping, machine learning, deep learning, optimization, simulation, force-closure
DOI: 10.3233/ICA-210659
Journal: Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 349-367, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl