Affiliations: [a] KU Leuven Public Governance Institute, Leuven, Belgium | [b] European Commission, Brussels, Belgium | [c] School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Maxim Chantillon, KU Leuven Public Governance Institute, Parkstraat 45, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel.: +32 16 37 70 62; Fax: +32 16 32 32 67; E-mail: maxim.chantillon@kuleuven.be.
Abstract: This article investigates which public values are prioritized in e-government policies, what the connection is to governance approaches and how the public value prioritization can be explained. Strategic horizontal e-government policy documents are analysed from 2000 to 2018 in Belgium, the United Kingdom and the European Union. A public value typology is developed which connects three-ideal type governance approaches: (1) hierarchy, (2) market and (3) network. The results show that market related public values often play a dominant role in e-government policy documents, but so do – to a lesser degree – network related public values. Hierarchy related public values are seldom dominant. At the national level, four factors explain the prioritization: The attention for a specific governance approach at a given time, the influence of politics, the specific topic of the e-government policy document and the role of authors. Power distribution at the EU level plays a key role in defining the public values balance. This articles contributes to the knowledge on public values in e-government policies, the wider discussion on governance approaches in public administration and the need to understand the relation between public values and public value creation.
Keywords: E-government, public values, governance approaches
