Affiliations: Information Systems Group, Department of Accounting
and Finance, University of Botswana, Botswana. E-mail: uzokaf@mopipi.ub.bw,
uzokafm@yahoo.com
Abstract: Research is crucial in universities' contribution to national and
global development. A few models have been developed for the evaluation of
research contributions of university academic staff, especially at
inter-institutional levels. Most of the models have focused on number and
quality of output as key determinants of research productivity. In this study,
a fuzzy-enhanced multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) model is developed for
the evaluation of research at the individual level. The model takes into
consideration a number of structured and unstructured criteria, which were
weighted by decision experts with a measure of confidence. The results show
that the highest premiums are placed on type of publication (25.8%) and
quality of publication (25.0%). Others are: specialization/research focus
(14.6%), reputation of publisher (13.3%), authorship (11.4%), and
place of publication (9.9%). The study also provides a multi-dimensional
basis of analysis of peer research output for selection purposes.
Keywords: Research, evaluation, multi criteria, fuzzy, analytic hierarchy process, research productivity