Affiliations: [a] Centre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine, Dental Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK | [b] Camstech Ltd, Campus Technology Hub, Daresbury Laboratory, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Sci-Tech Daresbury, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, UK | [c] Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Angray S. Kang, Centre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. %****␣hab-29-hab210449_temp.tex␣Line␣25␣**** E-mail: a.s.kang@qmul.ac.uk.
Abstract: PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Here we critically evaluate the literature on immunotherapy failure in inflammatory bowel disease patients. In particular anti-drug antibody production, and subsequently loss of response as the primary cause of immunotherapy failure in IBD patients. The benefits of shifting from the “standard” empirical dose escalation approach to therapeutic drug monitoring with anti-TNFα therapy is explored. RECENT FINDINGS: The American Gastroenterology Association and British Society of Gastroenterology both currently recommend the use of reactive therapeutic drug monitoring to guide treatment, following loss of response in inflammatory bowel disease patients with active disease. However, further research is required to prove the efficacy of a proactive therapeutic drug monitoring approach alone in remitted IBD patients. SUMMARY: A combination of personalised monitoring approach for anti-drug antibodies and therapeutic drug monitoring could provide beneficial treatment outcome for people with inflammatory bowel disease by predicting drug failure prior to clinical symptoms and allowing timely switching to an alternative drug.
