Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Special issue devoted to the best paper presented at the 32nd Italian Conference on Computational Logic (CILC 2017)
Guest editors: Dario Della Monica, Aniello Murano and Luigi Sauro
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Cantone, Domenico; * | Nicolosi-Asmundo, Marianna | Santamaria, Daniele Francesco
Affiliations: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Italy. cantone@dmi.unict.it, nicolosi@dmi.unict.it, santamaria@dmi.unict.it
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Italy
Abstract: In this paper we consider the most common TBox and ABox reasoning services for the description logic ๐โโฉ4LQSR,xโช(D) (๐โD4,ร, for short) and prove their decidability via a reduction to the satisfiability problem for the set-theoretic fragment 4LQSR. ๐โD4,ร is a very expressive description logic. It combines the high scalability and efficiency of rule languages such as the SemanticWeb Rule Language (SWRL) with the expressivity of description logics. In fact, among other features, it supports Boolean operations on concepts and roles, role constructs such as the product of concepts and role chains on the left-hand side of inclusion axioms, role properties such as transitivity, symmetry, reflexivity, and irreflexivity, and data types. We further provide a KE-tableau-based procedure that allows one to reason on the main TBox and ABox reasoning tasks for the description logic ๐โD4,ร. Our algorithm is based on a variant of the KE-tableau system for sets of universally quantified clauses, where the KE-elimination rule is generalized in such a way as to incorporate the ฮณ-rule. The novel system, called KEฮณ-tableau, turns out to be an improvement of the system introduced in [1] and of standard first-order KE-tableaux [2]. Suitable benchmark test sets executed on C++ implementations of the three mentioned systems show that in several cases the performances of the KEฮณ-tableau-based reasoner are up to about 400% better than the ones of the other two systems.
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1977
Journal: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 349-384, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
ๅฆๆๆจๅจๅบ็ๆน้ข้่ฆๅธฎๅฉๆๆไปปไฝๅปบ, ไปถ่ณ: editorial@iospress.nl