Note: [*] A short version of this paper appeared in [12]. This research is partially supported by GNCS-13 and GNCS-14 projects.
Note: [†] Address for correspondence: DISIM, Università di L’Aquila, Italy
Abstract: In recent work, we provided a formulation of ASP programs in terms of linear logic theories. Answer sets were characterized in terms of maximal tensor conjunctions provable from such theories. In this paper, we propose a full comparison between Answer Set Semantics and its variation obtained by interpreting literals (including negative literals) as resources, which leads to a different interpretation of negation. We argue that this novel view can be of both theoretical and practical interest, and we propose a modified Answer Set Semantics that we call Resource-based Answer Set Semantics. An advantage is that of avoiding inconsistencies, as every program has a (possibly empty) resource-based answer set. This implies however the introduction of a different way of representing constraints. We provide a characterization of the new semantics as a variation of the answer set semantics, and also in terms of Autoepistemic Logic. The latter characterization leads to a way of computing resource-based answer set via answer set solvers.
Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Default Negation, Linear Logic, Autoepistemic Logic
