Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Martocchia, A.a; *; 1 | Ialungo, S.b; 1 | Dulcetti, A.a | Malena, D.M.b | Proietta, M.b | Del Porto, F.b | Landolfi, F.c | Sesti, G.b | Sergi, D.c | Martelletti, P.a
Affiliations: [a] Emergency Medicine Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy | [b] Internal Medicine Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy | [c] Radiology Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Antonio Martocchia, MD, PhD, S.Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy. E-mail: antonio.martocchia@uniroma1.it.
Note: [1] A. Martocchia and S. Ialungo are equal contributors.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:This study aims to evaluate the bedside use of the pocket-sized ultrasound (US) device for the detection of the intracavitary effusions. METHODS:We randomly enrolled 40 patients admitted to S. Andrea Hospital of Rome. Every patient received a clinical and biochemical evaluation and a bedside US examination to detect and estimate the intracavitary (pleural, pericardial and intra-abdominal) effusions; the US measurements have been compared to the computed tomography (CT) scans (as gold standard). RESULTS:The patients presented a high prevalence of effusions: right pleural 16/40 = 40% (esteemed volume 236.3±500.7 ml, mean±standard deviation m±SD), left pleural 8/40 = 20% (127.0±377.4 ml), pericardial 12/40 = 30% (47.5±72.8 ml) and intra-abdominal effusions 5/40 = 12.5% of cases (110.9±600.6 ml). Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between US and CT measurements: pleural r = 0.973 p < 1×10–38, pericardial r = 0.927 p < 1×10–39, intra-abdominal space r = 0.921 p < 1×10–59. The accuracy of the bedside US at the pleural, pericardial and abdominal level was respectively 98%, 93% and 96% (Cohen’s kappa coefficient 0.966, 0.841 and 0.833). CONCLUSIONS:The present study showed a high prevalence of the intracavitary effusions and a high accuracy of the bedside US. The bedside US by a pocket-sized device is promising tool for its advantages of reproducibility and non-invasiveness of the device.
Keywords: Bedside ultrasound, intracavitary effusions, comorbidity, computed tomography
DOI: 10.3233/CH-221402
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 233-240, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl