Affiliations: [a] Institut für Röntgendiagnostik und Nuklearmedizin, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig gGmbH, Salzdahlumer str. 90, Braunschweig, Germany | [b] Klinik für Neurologie, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig gGmbH, Braunschweig, Germany | [c] Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universtitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Carolina Rio Bartulos, Institut für Röntgendiagnostik und Nuklearmedizin, Städtischen Klinikum Braunschweig gGmbH, Salzdahlumer str. 90, 38126 Braunschweig, Germany. E-mail: c.rio.bartulos@klinikum-braunschweig.de.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:In clinical practice, decisions often must be made rapidly; therefore, automated software is useful for diagnostic support. Perfusion computed tomography and follow-up evaluation of perfusion data are valuable tools for selecting the optimal recanalization therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to compare commercially available software used to evaluate stroke patients prior to thrombectomy. METHODS:The performance of Olea Sphere (OlS) software vs. CT Neuro Perfusion from Syngo (Sy), as well as the electronic Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (e-ASPECTS) software vs. an experienced radiologist, were compared using descriptive statistics including significance analysis, Spearman’s correlation, and the Bland-Altman agreement analysis. For this purpose, 43 data sets of patients with stroke symptoms related to the middle cerebral artery territory were retrospectively post-processed with both tools and analyzed. RESULTS:The automatic e-ASPECTS showed high agreement with an expert rater assessment of the ASPECTS. Using OlS and Sy, we compared the parameters for the ischemic core (relative cerebral blood flow), Time to maximum (Tmax) for the penumbra, and the relative mismatch between these two values. Overall, both software tools achieved good agreement, and their respective values correlated well with each other. However, OlS predicted significantly smaller infarct core volumes compared with Sy. CONCLUSIONS:Although the absolute values have a certain degree of variation, both software programs have good agreement with each other.
