Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zhang, Fan; 1 | Li, Gang; 2 | Jin, Lifang | Jia, Chao | Shi, Qiusheng | Wu, Rong; *
Affiliations: Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Xin Song Jiang Road, Shanghai, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Rong Wu, Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, 650 Xin Song Jiang Road, Song Jiang District, Shanghai, 201600, China. E-mail: wurong7111@163.com.
Note: [1] First author.
Note: [2] Co-author.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To evaluate and optimize the additional diagnostic value of Doppler imaging for malignant NMLs detected by US. MATERIALS AND METHODS:The characteristics of 233 NMLs in Doppler imaging were analyzed, and different Adler grades of intralesional vessels were selected as the diagnostic cutoffs on Doppler imaging: grade 1 in the full cohort and in women < 40 years, and grade 0 in women ≥40 years. The diagnostic performance of US and US + Doppler imaging were calculated and compared with that of mammography. RESULTS:The AUC of US + Doppler was larger than that of US alone in each group (P < 0.001). In the full cohort, addition of Doppler imaging increased specificity of US, but decreased sensitivity. However, by use of different diagnostic cutoffs in the two subgroups, it was possible to achieve high sensitivity and specificity simultaneously, which were 100% and 75.8% in women < 40 years, 94.7% and 69.5% in women ≥40 years, respectively. The AUC + Doppler was comparable to that of mammography in the full cohort and in women ≥40 years. In women < 40 years, the AUC of the combination was larger than that of mammography (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:Doppler imaging, with different Adler grades used as cutoffs in older versus younger women, can improve the specificity of US for the diagnosis of malignant NMLs without losing sensitivity. In younger women, US + Doppler imaging may be better than mammography.
Keywords: Breast, ultrasound, doppler, mammography, diagnosis
DOI: 10.3233/CH-211371
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 123-134, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl