Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: White, Jennella; b | Lancelot, Moirac | Gao, Xiufengb | Tarasev, Michaelb; d | Chakraborty, Sumitad | Emanuele, Martye | Hines, Patrick C.b; f; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA | [b] Functional Fluidics, Detroit, MI, USA | [c] Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA | [d] Blaze Medical Devices, Ann Arbor, MI, USA | [e] Mast therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA | [f] Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Patrick Hines, MD/Ph.D., 3901 Beaubien, Blvd., Suite 4134, Detroit, MI, USA. Tel.: +1 313 745 629; Fax: +1 313 996 0105; Email: phines@med.wayne.edu.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Red blood cell (RBC)-modifying therapies have provided new opportunities for patients with sickle cell disease, although the absence of validated biomarkers of RBC function is a barrier to FDA approval and clinical adoption. Flow Adhesion (FA) and Mechanical Fragility (MF) biomarkers objectively stratify individuals with SCD into pro-adhesive vs pro-hemolytic phenotypes respectively, which may potentially help predict therapeutic responses. OBJECTIVE:A Phase 3 clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of vepoloxamer, an RBC-modifying therapy in sickle cell disease (SCD), failed to meet its primary clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether standardized flow adhesion and mechanical fragility bioassays could differentiate cellular level “responders” from “non-responders” to vepoloxamer treatment. METHODS:Standardized biomarkers of RBC function (adhesion and mechanical fragility) were utilized in this study to assess the effect of veploxamer on blood samples collected from SCD subjects and to determine whether our assays could differentiate cellular-level “responders” from “non-responders” to vepoloxamer treatment. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for differences in adhesion in response to varying vepoloxamer treatments and a Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was used to assess differences in mechanical fragility, pre- and post-vepoloxamer treatment. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS:In this study, we report that in vitro treatment with vepoloxamer reduced adhesion by >75%in 54%of patient samples and induced changes in the membranes of sickle erythrocytes (SSRBCs) making sickle cells behave more like normal erythrocytes (AARBCs) in terms of their resistance to hemolysis. CONCLUSION:This study demonstrates that the standardized flow adhesion and mechanical fragility biomarkers described here may be useful tools to predict clinical responders to RBC-modifying therapies.
Keywords: Sickle cell disease, adhesion, vepoloxamer, mechanical fragility, blood function assays
DOI: 10.3233/CH-200944
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 127-138, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl