Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Hemostasis
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Koster, M. | Amann-Vesti, B.R. | Husmann, M. | Jacomella, V. | Meier, T.O. | Jeanneret, C. | Hafner, J. | Thalhammer, C.
Affiliations: Clinic for Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland | Clinic for Angiology, University Hospital Bruderholz, Bruderholz, Switzerland | Clinic for Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Note: [] Corresponding author: Christoph Thalhammer, MD, Clinic for Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: christoph.thalhammer@usz.ch
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Venous pressure measurement using an intravenous catheter is the sole method for the diagnosis of venous hypertension in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. A noninvasive tool to quantify increased venous pressure is essential for studying venous pathophysiology. Aim of the study was to investigate the value of controlled compression ultrasound (CCU) for noninvasive assessment of venous pressure (VP) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) in healthy persons and patients with venous insufficiency to quantify venous hypertension. METHODS: An optimal visible part of the GSV directly above the ankle was marked on the skin and compressed under ultrasound control and pressure needed for complete compression of the vein was recorded using a pressure manometer with a translucent silicone membrane. Complete insufficiency of the GSV (Hach IV) was documented by duplex ultrasound by an independent investigator before start of the study. VP measurement was performed while normal breathing, deep inspiration and expiration and during a standardized Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS: Twenty controls and 19 patients with complete insufficiency of the GSV were included. Valsalva maneuver induced a slight increase in VP in controls (20.1 ± 4.5 vs 25.1 ± 6.6 mbar) but a significant higher increase in patients from 26 to 37 mbar (IQR 18.5–28.0 vs 31.5–43.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive venous pressure measurement of the great saphenous vein using CCU is feasible and documents an increased pressure during Valsalva maneuver in Hach IV patients compared to healthy controls.
Keywords: Chronic venous insufficiency, venous hypertension, noninvasive pressure measurement, compression ultrasound
DOI: 10.3233/CH-131737
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 325-332, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl