Affiliations: [a]
1st Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| [b]
Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Andras Toth, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Pecs, 7624
Pecs, Ifjusag ut 13., Hungary. Tel.: +36 72535861; Fax: +36 72536148; E-mail: toth.andras@pte.hu.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Viscosity measurement is challenging due to the internal properties of blood and the artifacts deriving from the various viscometer systems. OBJECTIVE:We aimed to determine the pitfalls of a cone-plate viscometer (Brookfield DV-III Ultra LV) before starting measurements and compare it to our capillary type model (Hemorex Hevimet 40). Effects of sample storage and thermal calibration were assessed as well. METHODS AND RESULTS:Intra-observer variability was studied by 10 replicate measurements of 7 blood samples, mean coefficients of variation were less than 5%. Instruments were compared by measuring 26 blood samples, an average difference of 7% in WBV and 10% in PV was observed. 9 blood samples were stored at 4°C, 22°C and 37°C up to 48 hours to study the effect of storage on viscosity values. WBV at 50 and 100 s-1 became significantly lower after 3 hours at 37°C (p < 0.05). WBV at higher shear rates and PV remained constant at all temperatures. To evaluate the possibility of measuring one sample at different temperatures, 8 blood samples were measured at 40°C with the device calibrated both at 20°C and 40°C; no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSIONS:Thorough validation studies are required before starting experimental and routine viscosity measurements.
Keywords: Capillary, rotational, cone-plate, storage, reproducibility, temperature
