Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Xiang, Li-Huaa; b | Yao, Ming-Huaa; b | Xu, Guanga; b | Pu, Huana; b | Liu, Huia; b | Fang, Yana; b | Wu, Ronga; b; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China | [b] Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Rong Wu, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Tel.: +86 21 66301031; E-mail: wurong7111@163.com.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) are used for diagnostic purposes. OBJECTIVE:Investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS and SWE for breast lesions of sub-centimeter diameter. METHODS:Sixty-two patients (mean age: 49.3±12.1 years) with 66 lesions (mean diameter, 8.1±1.5 mm) were analyzed. Conventional ultrasound (US), CEUS and SWE were undertaken. Pathologic specimens were obtained through biopsy or surgery. Lesions were measured in kilopascals. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were analyzed. RESULTS:For conventional US, the sensitivity was 92.31%, specificity 28.30%, PPV 24.00%, NPV 93.75%, and accuracy 40.90%, whereas those for SWE were 61.54%, 98.11%, 88.89%, 91.23%, and 90.91% (p = 0.000) and CEUS were 92.31%, 60.38%, 36.37%, 96.97%, and 66.67% (p = 0.001), respectively. For SWE + CEUS, the sensitivity was 61.54%, specificity 100.00%, PPV 100.00%, NPV 91.38%, and accuracy 92.42% (p = 0.000). There was a significant difference between US and CEUS (p = 0.004), but not for SWE or SWE + CEUS (p = 0.568; p = 0.205). For SWE + CEUS, there was a significant difference with SWE alone and CEUS alone (p = 0.000; p = 0.008). Between SWE and CEUS, the difference was significant (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS:SWE and CEUS could help to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions <1 cm in diameter.
Keywords: Shear-wave elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, lesion, breast, diagnosis
DOI: 10.3233/CH-170250
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 69-80, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl