Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Erkal, Haldun Şükrü; | Karakoç, Yunus | Serin, Meltem
Affiliations: Department of Radiation Oncology, İnönü University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey | Department of Physiology, İnönü University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
Note: [] Corresponding author: Haldun Şükrü Erkal, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, İnönü University Faculty of Medicine, TR-44280, Malatya, Turkey. Tel.: +90 422 341 00 45; Fax: +90 422 341 00 36; E-mail:hserkal@inonu.edu.tr.
Abstract: Aim: The present study evaluates the effects of irradiation on the blood dynamics. Materials and methods: Thirty-six volunteers providing written consent participated. A blood sample was transferred into three tubes containing CPDA-1 solution while another blood sample was transferred into three tubes containing heparin. Each tube containing CPDA-1 solution was paired with another tube containing heparin. The first pair was not irradiated, not stored and analyzed immediately (Group 1). The second pair was not irradiated, stored and analyzed at seven days (Group 2). The third pair was irradiated, stored and analyzed at seven days (Group 3). The blood count was performed and the blood viscosity was determined. Results: The mean hemoglobin contents were 126 g/l for Group 1, 128 g/l for Group 2 and 129 g/l for Group 3. For the mean hemoglobin contents, the difference between Group 1 and Group 3 (P<0.001) and Group 2 and Group 3 (P=0.01) were significant. The mean red blood cell volumes were 81.8 fl for Group 1, 82.1 fl for Group 2 and 82.3 fl for Group 3. For the mean red blood cell volumes, the difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (P=0.003) and Group 1 and Group 3 (P=0.006) were significant. The mean blood viscosities were 2.2 mPa s for Group 1, 2.8 mPa s for Group 2 and 3.2 mPa s for Group 3. For the mean blood viscosities, the difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (P<0.001), Group 1 and Group 3 (P<0.001) and Group 2 and Group 3 (P=0.004) were significant. Conclusion: The present study indicates that the recommended doses of irradiation for the blood products to be used in attempt to prevent the transfusion associated graft versus host disease leads to marked alterations in the blood dynamics and might decrease the viability of the red blood cells following transfusion.
Keywords: Transfusion associated graft versus host disease, irradiation, blood dynamics
DOI: 10.3233/CH-2009-1177
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 263-267, 2009
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl