Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Brenner, Brian | Sanayei, Masoud | Lattanzi, David | Santini Bell, Erin
Affiliations: Tufts University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 113 Anderson Hall, Medford, MA 02155, USA | University of New Hampshire, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author. Email: Brian.Brenner@tufts.edu
Abstract: This paper describes a study evaluating increase in design strength, performance and capacity when including bridge parapets in a bridge analytical model. Traditionally, concrete parapets are treated solely as superimposed dead load in an overall bridge structural design. Parapets are detailed from a safety standpoint to resist impact forces from vehicle loading. However, in the global design models, the inherent strength of the parapets is not considered as a contributing factor to the overall strength of the bridge structure as a system. As part of an evaluation of global performance of bridge structures, the authors have prepared a set of three-dimensional finite element models of a simple span, composite concrete – steel stringer bridge. These models evaluate the overall strength and deflections under standard traffic loadings, with and without the stiffness contribution of the concrete parapets. These models predict a substantial increase in strength when including the parapets as a structural element rather than merely a superimposed dead load. Furthermore, standard details and construction procedures commonly in use to provide adequate strength for current code requirements seem to also provide sufficient strength to enable composite action between parapets and the bridge deck. The preliminary results from this analytical study indicate that current design practices are perhaps overly conservative in that they do not account for the system strength of the parapet. In some cases, ignoring the strength and stiffness contribution of parapets may be under-conservative, for example in pre-stressed concrete butted box beam bridges, longitudinal shear key joints may be adversely impacted by difference in stiffness in the adjacent box sections. This paper will investigate the advantages of including the evaluation of parapet strength, initial load rating and analysis during the life history of the bridge structure.
Keywords: Bridge parapets, Bridge system analysis, Bridge system design, Finite element modeling
DOI: 10.1080/15732480500247595
Journal: Bridge Structures, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 273-280, 2005
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl