Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Goh, Winfred Xi Taia; | Lee, Yien Sienb | Teo, Sze Yiunb
Affiliations: [a] MOH Holdings Pte Ltd, Singapore | [b] Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Winfred Xi Tai Goh, MD, FRCR, MOH Holdings Pte Ltd., 1 Maritime Square, #11-25 HarbourFront Centre, Singapore 099253, Singapore. Tel.: +65 8754 2589; E-mail: winfredgoh@gmail.com, winfred.goh@mohh.com.sg. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-1455
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The normal imaging appearances of the common agents used in injection mammoplasty and the challenges of mammography screening will be reviewed. METHODS:The local database from a tertiary hospital was accessed for imaging cases of injection mammoplasty. RESULTS:Free silicone is seen as multiple high-density opacities on mammograms. Silicone deposits can often be seen within axillary nodes due to lymphatic migration. Sonographically, a snowstorm appearance is seen when the silicone is diffusely distributed. On MRI, free silicone is hypointense on T1-weighted and hyperintense on T2-weighted images, with no contrast enhancement. Mammograms have a limited role in screening due to the high density of silicone. MRI is often required in these patients.Polyacrylamide gel and hyaluronic acid are seen as multiple collections on mammography. Polyacrylamide gel collections are of the same density as cysts, while hyaluronic acid collections are of higher density but less dense than silicone. On ultrasound, both can appear anechoic or show variable internal echoes. MRI demonstrates fluid signal with hypointense T1-weighted and hyperintense T2-weighted signal. Mammographic screening is possible if the injected material is located predominantly in the retro-glandular space without obscuring the breast parenchyma.On mammograms, autologous fat locules appear as lucent masses. Rim calcification can be seen if fat necrosis had developed. On ultrasound, focal fat collections can demonstrate varying levels of internal echogenicity, depending on the stage of fat necrosis. Mammographic screening is usually possible for patients after autologous fat injection as fat is hypodense compared to breast parenchyma. However, the dystrophic calcification associated with fat necrosis may mimic abnormal breast calcification. In such cases, MRI can be utilized as a problem-solving tool. CONCLUSION:It is important for the radiologist to recognize the type of injected material on the various imaging modalities and recommend the best modality for screening.
Keywords: Injection mammoplasty, mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI
DOI: 10.3233/BD-220059
Journal: Breast Disease, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 37-44, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl