Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Breast Reconstruction
Guest editors: C. Scott Hultman
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Weiler-Mithoff, Evaa | Hodgson, Elaine L.B.b | Malata, Charles M.b; *
Affiliations: [a] West of Scotland Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Canniesburn Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland | [b] Department of Plastic Surgery and Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's University Hospital, Cambridge, UK | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Mr. Charles M. Malata, Consultant Plastic Surgeon, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's University Hospital, Box 186, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK. Tel.: +44 1223 586 672; Fax: +44 1223 257 177; E-mail: contact@charlesmalata.com
Abstract: A perforator flap consists of skin and fat harvested from a donor site nourished by myocutaneous perforators while sparing the donor muscle for function and strength. This flap type has revolutionized microvascular free tissue transfer and the technique has been successfully applied to well-established donor sites for autologous breast reconstruction namely the lower abdomen, upper and lower buttock, the upper back, and the lateral thigh. Although these flaps are technically more demanding than conventional myocutaneous free flaps, their minimal impact on the donor site muscle function significantly reduces local morbidity, postoperative pain and hospital stay. Perforator flap breast reconstruction has an increased operating time because of the meticulous dissection of the perforators, the possible anatomical variation in their location and, once these are located, the difficulty in selecting suitable perforator(s) to base the flap on. Although it has been suggested that perforator flaps may have a higher incidence of fat necrosis and partial flap loss than conventional free myocutaneous flaps, this has not been borne out by clinical results. There is, however, a learning curve and careful patient selection is important. The role of perforator flap technique in breast reconstruction is evolving. While its indications are similar to those of free TRAM and gluteal flaps, it is clearly a better alternative to these. The choice of perforator flap depends on where the patient has the most abundant donor tissue and the surgeon's experience. These flaps may in the future become the standard of care in free flap breast reconstruction.
DOI: 10.3233/BD-2002-16114
Journal: Breast Disease, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 93-106, 2002
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl