Molecular and Clinical Insights into the Role and Significance of Mutated DNA Repair Genes in Bladder Cancer
Abstract
DNA damage response and repair genes (DDR genes) are commonly mutated in bladder cancer. The biological impact of these mutations is an area of intense basic, translational, and clinical interest. As next generation sequencing increases its foothold in the treatment of localized and advanced bladder cancer, the role of DDR genes will continue to evolve. We review the inventory and biology of DDR genes in bladder cancer and describe known and candidate roles for loss of DDR genes to engender therapeutic susceptibilities to various anti-cancer agents.
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, with emergence of immunotherapy in metastatic patients who are platinum ineligible or refractory. Recent insights from multiplatform genomic analysis has revealed a significant proportion of MIBCs that harbor mutations in DNA damage and response/repair genes (DDR genes). MIBC is notable for a relatively high frequency of DDR gene mutations and the potential for these mutations to impact selection of therapy. Other diseases such as metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer [1] and several familial cancer predisposition syndromes feature DDR alterations, but DDR loss of function through genetic alterations is otherwise rare in primary cancers. Mutations in MIBC driver genes identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) which have bona fide DDR roles include ERCC2 and ATM. Additional DDR genes are recurrently mutated but with lesser frequency and may also impact tumor biology and therapeutic sensitivities, irrespective of their nomination as a common driver gene – the number of drivers will increase as more cancer genomes are sequenced. In this review we will compare and contrast DDR mutations in MIBC with DDR mutations in other cancers, discuss their potential impact on tumor biology, and highlight the emerging roles of DDR genes as biomarkers for therapy selection based on proposed therapeutic vulnerabilities.
INVENTORY OF DDR GENES ALTERED IN MIBC
DDR genes ERCC2 and ATM are TCGA-nominated bladder cancer driver genes [2]. Both have been linked to complete or near complete pathological response to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy as measured by pathological examination of surgical specimens at the time of radical cystectomy [3–5], highlighting the intense interest in these genes as biomarkers. We chose to focus on mutations in DDR genes because most of the high impact studies focus on mutations as the mechanism of loss of function or to correlate with clinical outcomes, as opposed to mRNA or protein expression, which has not been as well described in MIBC as it is in other malignancies [6]. Additionally, we focused on mutations rather than copy number alterations again because this type of alteration is what is reported in most studies and because deletion through copy number alteration does not occur in ERCC2 or ATM in bladder cancer (Fig. 1). Indeed, because of ERCC2’s indispensable role in transcription, efforts to generate CRISPR knockout cell lines have not been successful, though point mutant variants can be viable (Mouw, Iyer, unpublished data, personal communication). Interestingly, the number of amplifications greatly outnumbers the number of deletions in this set of DDR genes in the TCGA, which is ‘counter-culture’ for tumor suppressor genes (Fig. 2). The clinical relevance of this observation is yet to be elucidated, but it is plausible to hypothesize that these tumors are hyper-proficient in repairing DNA damage and therefore may be intrinsically resistant to DNA-damaging chemotherapy regimens. We are not aware of convincing data to support this idea and will not speculate further though it may be a rationale for further study.
Fig.1
Fig.2
The exquisite tissue specificity of ERCC2 mutations is notable. ERCC2 has been found mutated in multiple bladder cancer cohorts at a rate of 10–18% [2–4, 7, 8] but not significantly in any other cancer cohort to our knowledge. Although the provisional TCGA cohort of adrenocortical carcinomas seems to have a high rate of D312N variants (unpublished), this variant is actually a common SNP with prevalence of 0.38 in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), and is nondeleterious [9]. Germline ERCC2 mutations are associated with xeroderma pigmentosum cross-complementation group D [10] (a hereditary skin cancer syndrome where patients develop normally), and trichothiodystrophy (an autosomal recessive condition where patients have abnormal development but no cancer predisposition [11, 12]). Interestingly, ERCC2 has two major functions relating to both transcriptional activation and nucleotide excision DNA repair (NER), but both xeroderma pigmentosum and trichothiodystrophy seem to be caused by a lack of DNA repair and not lack of transcriptional activity [13]. NER is both transcription-coupled and acts independent of transcription, and repairs a diverse set of DNA lesions such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (from UV exposure), inter-strand and intra-strand cross links (such as by cisplatin), cyclopurines resulting from reactive oxygen, and bulky adducts [14]. It appears that the transcription-coupled NER pathway is most relevant to MIBC and that the global genome NER pathway may be less relevant. Liu and colleagues recently showed that ERCC2-mutant tumors have a specific trinucleotide mutation signature. This signature is enriched on the + strand of transcribed genes, strongly implicating transcription-coupled repair as the primary mechanism lost in ERCC2-mutated cancers [15]. Along these lines, ERCC2’s role in bladder cancer seems to stem from its role in transcription-coupled NER; no defect related to its role in transcription has been identified yet. Interestingly, ‘ERCC2-ness’ (i.e. the genomic mutation signature associated with ERCC2 loss of function n [16]) is not unique to ERCC2-mutated tumors, so it is possible that other alterations, whether genetic, epigenetic, or alterations expression or activity level, result in incapacitated transcription-coupled NER. In support of its critical role in transcription, all point mutations in the gene are missense and appear to be inactivating [4]. Often tumor suppressors have truncating or frame-shifting mutations, suggesting that complete inactivation of ERCC2 through such a mechanism (or through deep deletion) results in reduced fitness and may be selected against.
In contrast to well-characterized hereditary cancer syndromes such as Von Hippel Lindau or familial adenomatous polyposis where the causative genes are also mutated in sporadic cancers, patients with deleterious germline ERCC2 mutations do not develop bladder cancer, suggesting it may not have a role in initiation of the disease but possibly in progression. In support of this hypothesis, ERCC2 is mutated more frequently in MIBC than nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (nMIBC [17]).
The next most commonly mutated DDR gene in MIBC is ATM. Like ERCC2, germline mutations of ATM are causative of a heritable cancer syndrome, ataxia telangiectasia. Germline mutations of this gene are also increasingly being recognized in nonsyndromic patients with advanced cancer, especially those with metastatic prostate cancer [1, 18, 19]. This kinase works upstream of p53 and acts as a part of DNA damage sensor pathway, sensing DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) [20–22]. Similar to ERCC2 carriers, ATM carriers also are not known to have increased risk of bladder cancer, again suggesting a role in progression but not initiation. ATM mutations in TCGA [2, 23] and those reported by our group [5] are also missense substitutions in the majority of cases. These alterations often affect key residues that, when mapped onto the three-dimensional structure of the protein, are found in the core of the protein that likely result in the inability to fold properly [5].
ERCC2 and ATM are mutated frequently and specifically in sporadic MIBC. Mutation of caretaker genes probably confers a selective advantage to cancer cells through generation of a diverse tumor ecology with intratumor heterogeneity, but DDR mutations are simply not as common in other sporadic cancers when compared to MIBC. Although sporadic DDR mutations have been described in several cancers, (e.g. BRCA1 and BRCA2 in sporadic breast/ovarian cancers) their frequency is <5% in aggregate in each cancer. For instance, in our query of the recent MSK-IMPACT study of >10,000 tumors with targeted sequencing for the genes listed in Fig. 1, bladder cancer (n = 422) tops the list of >40 tumors types with mutations in these genes in >30% of cases, excluding rare cases gestational trophoblastic disease (n = 11) and penile cancer (n = 7) [24] (Fig. 3). In terms of individual gene mutations, Hodgkins lymphoma had a 20% rate of MLH1 mutation, but very few cancers had a mutation rate >5% in the other genes (on a per-gene basis), underscoring the uniqueness of bladder cancer as a disease of DDR.
Fig.3
One notable DDR mutation in sporadic cancers is the POLE hotspot mutation which was initially identified in uterine cancer [25]. These hotspots result in DNA Polymerase ɛ loss of exonuclease function. This polymerase mediates DNA backfill at sites of DNA excision due to damage/repair, and POLE mutations are associated with accumulation of thousands of mutations per genome – a hypermutated phenotype – resulting from loss of DDR capacity. This mutation occurs in 7% of uterine cancers and at lower frequencies in other cancers.
Mismatch repair genes (MMR genes), germline mutation of which cause Lynch or Muir-Torre syndromes, are associated with upper tract urothelial cell carcinomas (UTUCCs [26, 27]) and are probably under-recognized in metastatic UTUCC [28]. MMR is a highly evolutionarily conserved process which was first described in Streptococcus pneumoniae [29] and Escherichia coli [30] among other prokaryotes and yeast. Its most well-studied function is to repair mismatches and indels which occur during mostly DNA replication (as opposed to ATM and ERCC2 proteins which function in repair of DNA damage). In whole exome sequencing studies, colorectal tumors which arise in Lynch Syndrome patients acquire mutations at a rate at least one order of magnitude higher than sporadic tumors as a result of the loss of MMR [31, 32]. Although UTUCCs of Lynch syndrome patients have not been studied using whole exome sequencing to our knowledge, it seems likely that they behave in a similar manner. For instance, Lynch syndrome patients with endometrial tumors (another Lynch-associated cancer) form tumors with much higher mutational burden than non-Lynch endometrial cancers [33]. Given the evolutionarily conserved role of these proteins in DDR, a plausible explanation for UTUCC carcinogenesis is loss of caretaker function in Lynch cases with accumulation of mutations leading to carcinoma.
MMR is clinically measured by quantitating microsatellite instability (MSI). Microsatellites are short repeats, most often CA repeats, which occur at thousands of sites throughout the genome and often at the 3’ end of genes. The lengths of these repeats becomes unstable in tumors with MMR deficiency, and differences between the length of the repeat in germline (which is constant) and tumor (which becomes variable) can be measured to assess if MSI (and MMR deficiency by proxy) is present. Although likely relevant in UTUCCs, it should be noted, that MMR deficiency is extremely uncommon in bladder cancer. A recent study showed that 1/253 cases of bladder cancer in the TCGA cohort had microsatellite instability [34], in agreement with prior studies [35, 36].
Mutations in ERCC2, ATM, and MMR genes are the most well established and studied DDR alterations occurring in bladder cancer, but additional DDR mutations occur in bladder cancer that are not TCGA-nominated bladder cancer genes or well-known familial cancer genes. Genes involved in homologous repair such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 are recurrently but infrequently mutated. Similarly, multiple genes in the Fanconi Anemia pathway such as PALB2, FANCD2, and FANCC are recurrently but infrequently mutated in bladder cancer.
BIOLOGY OF DDR GENES ALTERED IN MIBC
An intuitive and plausible mechanism of chemosensitivity manifests in the idea that loss of the ability to sense or repair DNA damage brought on by cytotoxic chemotherapy results in persistent DNA lesions which ultimately cause the death of the cell through intrinsic apoptosis pathways. In lower eukaryotic organisms, this paradigm is known as synthetic sickness or lethality [37, 38], where mutation or loss of either of two pathways or genes permits the cell to persist but loss of both genes or pathways results in loss of viability [39]. This paradigm has led to the successful application of PARP inhibitors to patients with breast or ovarian cancer who are BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers [40–42]. BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are intimately involved in homologous repair (HR) of DSBs, so inhibition of the base-excision repair pathway by PARP inhibitors will convert single strand breaks (SSB) to DSBs which cannot be repaired in tumor cells descendent from BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers [39, 43]. And recently, PARP inhibitors were shown to have significant activity in patients with metastatic prostate cancer but activity was limited to patients carrying germline or somatic mutation in DDR genes, most often BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM [1]. Similar application of PARP inhibitors to BRCA2-mutant tumors might be feasible, given the rate of BRCA2 deleterious mutations in urothelial cancer, mostly via truncating mutations (Fig. 1).
A similar therapeutic relationship is emerging between cisplatin and ERCC2, ATM, and other DDR mutations in MIBC with respect to cisplatin sensitivity. When ERCC2 mutations are present in MIBCs, the overall mutation rate in each tumor is tripled [4], reminiscent of a hypermutator phenotype, and suggesting these mutations do primarily result in the inability of the tumor to repair DNA damage. Indeed, tumor-associated somatic ERCC2 variants lack the ability to rescue viability in fibroblasts derived from patients with germline ERCC2 loss when treated with cisplatin [4]. A similar increase in somatic mutations per tumor occur when ATM, RB1, or FANCC are mutated in bladder cancers: chemotherapy responders had 43% more alterations in a panel of 216 clinically-relevant genes than nonresponders [5]. DDR mutations also strongly associate with complete or near complete response in multiple bladder cancer cohorts from independent institutions [3, 5].
This therapeutic susceptibility may be relevant more generally. For instance, when a subset of DDR genes is mutated at a lower frequency as detected by panel targeted sequencing, there is associated increase in survival in patients with advanced urothelial cancers who were treated with cisplatin [44]. DDR gene mutations identified in panel targeted sequencing also associated with prolonged survival in MIBC patients treated with chemoradiation [45], suggesting DDR gene mutations may be prognostic markers in this setting. In another study, patients with somatic DDR gene mutations or carriers of germline DDR mutations had prolonged recurrence free survival, again pointing to their potential utility as prognostic biomarkers. However, this latter study does not stratify germline variants of unknown significance from deleterious or likely deleterious variants. Many of these germline or somatic variants may be nondeleterious because the majority of SNPs (which are common in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, ERCC2) are either benign or variants of unknown significance. We calculated the percentage of variants found in the ClinVar database [46] not known to be deleterious for each of these genes (Table 1). In each case, half to three-quarters of the variants have known benign or unknown effects. This underscores the importance of functional annotation against known databases or experimental validation of variants when identified in such studies.
Table 1
Pathogenic | Likely pathogenic | VUS | Other | Total | % not known to be delterious | |
ATM | 464 | 290 | 1772 | 753 | 3279 | 77.0% |
BRCA1 | 2445 | 210 | 1980 | 1199 | 5834 | 54.5% |
BRCA2 | 2738 | 222 | 3265 | 1557 | 7782 | 62.0% |
ERCC2 | 21 | 4 | 41 | 46 | 112 | 77.7% |
It is not clear whether a different set of mutations engenders therapeutic susceptibility to radiation compared to chemotherapy. The damage from chemotherapy, particularly cisplatin, causes intra- and interstrand crosslinks, as compared to radiation which causes DSBs. Other DNA damaging chemotherapeutic agents used in bladder cancer such as doxorubicin cause different types of damage as well. This distinction is critical because each type of genetic insult requires a specific pathway for repair, and therefore the mutation causing pathway loss of function would be expected to dictate the therapeutic susceptibility. For instance, BRCA2 loss-of-function mutations would wipeout the cell’s ability to repair DSBs, potentially resulting in radiotherapy or PARP inhibitor susceptibility.
Other DDR mutations also associate with chemoresponse. Whereas studies focusing on ERCC2 mutations used whole exome sequencing, other studies have used panel next generation sequencing (NGS). Using a clinical NGS panel, it was shown that mutation of ATM, RB1, or FANCC associated with partial response and progression-free and overall survival [5]. Although in vitro functional validation was not undertaken to characterize these mutations, molecular modeling of the 3-D structures of the variant ATM and RB1 proteins revealed that most of the mutations fell within residues which were critical to protein folding or kinase function (for ATM) or interaction with DP1/E2F transcription factors (for RB1).
MMR deficiency may require an approach different from synthetic lethality though. MMR primarily repairs DNA replication errors and not DNA damage, therefore application of DNA damaging therapeutics might not be expected to elicit a strong apoptotic response. Some studies in other tumor types have suggested that loss of expression of MMR proteins associates with cisplatin resistance [47–50] but the relationship between MMR status and chemosensitivity status is yet to be borne out in urothelial cancer.
However, another candidate therapeutic vulnerability has been identified in tumors with high mutation burdens: PD1/PDL1-directed immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies [31]. The rationale for such an approach rests in the finding that patients who respond to immune checkpoint blockade tend to have a higher number of mutations per tumor than nonresponders [51–54]. Each mutation can give rise to one or more than one neoantigen, defined as the mutant peptide that arises from a nonsynonymous or frameshifting variant. These can be recognized as non-self by the immune system. Neoantigen burden is directly correlated to mutation load: about half of nonsynonymous variants give rise to a neoantigen, with almost 40% of those being in an expressed gene [55]. In this sense, neoantigens are like lottery tickets – the more tickets one purchases, the more likely one is to hit the jackpot. Alternatively, many smaller jackpots may lead to a big payday as well. To this end, several well-done studies have shown that indeed anti-neoantigen CD8 T cell responses can be detected in patients who respond to immune checkpoint blockade [52–54] and other immune therapies [56] and that the number of anti-neoantigen T cells increases as patients respond. MMR deficiency, and possibly DDR deficiency more broadly, therefore may enable successful use of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with MIBC. In light of the high response rate to these drugs in clinical trials [57–61] and the high burden of DDR mutations in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers, it seems likely that there is significant overlap. DDR mutations could plausibly be seen as a predictive biomarker of response to these drugs, but this hasn’t been explored or reported yet. Again, it is important to note, this approach may be even more relevant in UTUCCs given the higher incidence of presumed MMR deficiency, the expected high number of neoantigens arising from frameshifts, and the potential for increased immunogenicity of such neoantigens [31, 32].
CONCLUSION
The finding that DDR mutations are associated with susceptibility to chemotherapies and immunotherapies is a transformative avenue of research for clinic trialists and basic and translational researchers. More effort in this area is likely to yield numerous benefits to patients with localized or metastatic bladder cancer. It is foreseeable that the benefit immune checkpoint blockade may extend outside of MMR deficient tumors to tumors with any DDR mutation or even a high neoantigen burden with WT DDR genes. However, the bladder cancer research community must be cognizant of the potential to advance the care of the same subset of patients repetitively without developing improved therapies and outcomes for patients with WT DDR pathways. It is possible that the DNA damaging agents and immunotherapies benefit the same subset of patients, in which case the argument can be made that the improvement is more incremental than transformative. In any case, these findings have added significant understanding to the fundamental mechanisms of how anticancer therapies work as well as paradigm-shifting rationales for treatment selection in urothelial cancer. In time, these findings will translate to personalized medicine algorithms for a subset of patients with DDR mutations, with the hope of extending these benefits to all patients using the same or likely yet untested urothelial cancer agents.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(ERP) Methods for Screening Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Responsiveness. U.S. Patent Application No.: 14/588,503, Filed 1/2/2015.
(PHA) No conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
[1] | Mateo J , Carreira S , Sandhu S , Miranda S , Mossop H , Perez-Lopez R , Nava Rodrigues D , Robinson D , Omlin A , Tunariu N , Boysen G , Porta N , Flohr P , Gillman A , Figueiredo I , Paulding C , Seed G , Jain S , Ralph C , Protheroe A , Hussain S , Jones R , Elliott T , McGovern U , Bianchini D , Goodall J , Zafeiriou Z , Williamson CT , Ferraldeschi R , Riisnaes R , Ebbs B , Fowler G , Roda D , Yuan W , Wu YM , Cao X , Brough R , Pemberton H , A’Hern R , Swain A , Kunju LP , Eeles R , Attard G , Lord CJ , Ashworth A , Rubin MA , Knudsen KE , Feng FY , Chinnaiyan AM , Hall E , de Bono JS . DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine (2015) ;373: (18):1697–708. |
[2] | Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature (2014) ;507: (7492):315–22. |
[3] | Liu D , Plimack ER , Hoffman-Censits J , Garraway LA , Bellmunt J , Van Allen E , Rosenberg JE . Clinical validation of chemotherapy response biomarker ERCC2 in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma. JAMA Oncol (2016) ;2: (8):1094–6. |
[4] | Van Allen EM , Mouw KW , Kim P , Iyer G , Wagle N , Al-Ahmadie H , Zhu C , Ostrovnaya I , Kryukov GV , O’Connor KW , Sfakianos J , Garcia-Grossman I , Kim J , Guancial EA , Bambury R , Bahl S , Gupta N , Farlow D , Qu A , Signoretti S , Barletta JA , Reuter V , Boehm J , Lawrence M , Getz G , Kantoff P , Bochner BH , Choueiri TK , Bajorin DF , Solit DB , Gabriel S , D’Andrea A , Garraway LA , Rosenberg JE . Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Discovery (2014) ;4: (10):1140–53. |
[5] | Plimack ER , Dunbrack RL , Brennan TA , Andrake MD , Zhou Y , Serebriiskii IG , Slifker M , Alpaugh K , Dulaimi E , Palma N , Hoffman-Censits J , Bilusic M , Wong YN , Kutikov A , Viterbo R , Greenberg RE , Chen DY , Lallas CD , Trabulsi EJ , Yelensky R , McConkey DJ , Miller VA , Golemis EA , Ross EA . Defects in DNA repair genes predict response to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. European Urology (2015) ;68: (6):959–67. |
[6] | Olaussen KA , Dunant A , Fouret P , Brambilla E , Andre F , Haddad V , Taranchon E , Filipits M , Pirker R , Popper HH , Stahel R , Sabatier L , Pignon JP , Tursz T , Le Chevalier T , Soria JC , Investigators IB. DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The New England Journal of Medicine (2006) ;355: (10):983–91. |
[7] | Al-Ahmadie HA , Iyer G , Lee BH , Scott SN , Mehra R , Bagrodia A , Jordan EJ , Gao SP , Ramirez R , Cha EK , Desai NB , Zabor EC , Ostrovnaya I , Gopalan A , Chen YB , Fine SW , Tickoo SK , Gandhi A , Hreiki J , Viale A , Arcila ME , Dalbagni G , Rosenberg JE , Bochner BH , Bajorin DF , Berger MF , Reuter VE , Taylor BS , Solit DB . Frequent somatic CDH1 loss-of-function mutations in plasmacytoid variant bladder cancer. Nature Genetics (2016) ;48: (4):356–8. |
[8] | Guo G , Sun X , Chen C , Wu S , Huang P , Li Z , Dean M , Huang Y , Jia W , Zhou Q , Tang A , Yang Z , Li X , Song P , Zhao X , Ye R , Zhang S , Lin Z , Qi M , Wan S , Xie L , Fan F , Nickerson ML , Zou X , Hu X , Xing L , Lv Z , Mei H , Gao S , Liang C , Gao Z , Lu J , Yu Y , Liu C , Li L , Fang X , Jiang Z , Yang J , Li C , Zhao X , Chen J , Zhang F , Lai Y , Lin Z , Zhou F , Chen H , Chan HC , Tsang S , Theodorescu D , Li Y , Zhang X , Wang J , Yang H , Gui Y , Wang J , Cai Z . Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing of bladder cancer identifies frequent alterations in genes involved in sister chromatid cohesion and segregation. Nature Genetics (2013) ;45: (12):1459–63. |
[9] | Lunn RM , Helzlsouer KJ , Parshad R , Umbach DM , Harris EL , Sanford KK , Bell DA . XPD polymorphisms: Effects on DNA repair proficiency. Carcinogenesis (2000) ;21: (4):551–5. |
[10] | Flejter WL , McDaniel LD , Johns D , Friedberg EC , Schultz RA . Correction of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D mutant cell phenotypes by chromosome and gene transfer: Involvement of the human ERCC2 DNA repair gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1992) ;89: (1):261–5. |
[11] | Faghri S , Tamura D , Kraemer KH , Digiovanna JJ . Trichothiodystrophy: A systematic review of 112 published cases characterises a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Journal of Medical Genetics (2008) ;45: (10):609–21. |
[12] | Taylor EM , Broughton BC , Botta E , Stefanini M , Sarasin A , Jaspers NG , Fawcett H , Harcourt SA , Arlett CF , Lehmann AR . Xeroderma pigmentosum and trichothiodystrophy are associated with different mutations in the XPD (ERCC2) repair/transcription gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1997) ;94: (16):8658–63. |
[13] | de Boer J , Andressoo JO , de Wit J , Huijmans J , Beems RB , van Steeg H , Weeda G , van der Horst GT , van Leeuwen W , Themmen AP , Meradji M , Hoeijmakers JH . Premature aging in mice deficient in DNA repair and transcription. Science (2002) ;296: (5571):1276–9. |
[14] | Marteijn JA , Lans H , Vermeulen W , Hoeijmakers JH . Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2014) ;15: (7):465–81. |
[15] | Liu D, Abbosh P, Keliher D, Reardon B, Miao D, Mouw K, Weiner-Taylor A, Wankowicz S, Han G, Teo MY, Cipolla C, Kim J, Iyer G, Al-Ahmadie H, Dulaimi E, Chen DYT, Alpaugh RK, Hoffman-Censits J, Garraway LA, Getz G, Carter SL, Bellmunt J, Plimack ER, Rosenberg JE, Van Allen EM. Mutational patterns in chemotherapy resistant muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Commun (2017) ;8: (1):2193. |
[16] | Kim J , Mouw KW , Polak P , Braunstein LZ , Kamburov A , Tiao G , Kwiatkowski DJ , Rosenberg JE , Van Allen EM , D’Andrea AD , Getz G . Somatic ERCC2 mutations are associated with a distinct genomic signature in urothelial tumors. Nature Genetics (2016) ;48: (6):600–6. |
[17] | Kim J , Akbani R , Creighton CJ , Lerner SP , Weinstein JN , Getz G , Kwiatkowski DJ . Invasive bladder cancer: Genomic insights and therapeutic promise. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research (2015) ;21: (20):4514–24. |
[18] | Jones S , Anagnostou V , Lytle K , Parpart-Li S , Nesselbush M , Riley DR , Shukla M , Chesnick B , Kadan M , Papp E , Galens KG , Murphy D , Zhang T , Kann L , Sausen M , Angiuoli SV , Diaz LA Jr , Velculescu VE. Personalized genomic analyses for cancer mutation discovery and interpretation. . Science Translational Medicine (2015) ;7: (283):283ra53. |
[19] | Goodall J , Mateo J , Yuan W , Mossop H , Porta N , Miranda S , Perez-Lopez R , Dolling D , Robinson DR , Sandhu S , Fowler G , Ebbs B , Flohr P , Seed G , Rodrigues DN , Boysen G , Bertan C , Atkin M , Clarke M , Crespo M , Figueiredo I , Riisnaes R , Sumanasuriya S , Rescigno P , Zafeiriou Z , Sharp A , Tunariu N , Bianchini D , Gillman A , Lord CJ , Hall E , Chinnaiyan AM , Carreira S , de Bono JS , investigators T-A. Circulating free DNA to guide prostate cancer treatment with PARP inhibition. Cancer Discovery 2017. |
[20] | Bakkenist CJ , Kastan MB . DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature (2003) ;421: (6922):499–506. |
[21] | Shiloh Y . ATM and related protein kinases: Safeguarding genome integrity. Nature Reviews Cancer (2003) ;3: (3):155–68. |
[22] | Savitsky K , Bar-Shira A , Gilad S , Rotman G , Ziv Y , Vanagaite L , Tagle DA , Smith S , Uziel T , Sfez S , Ashkenazi M , Pecker I , Frydman M , Harnik R , Patanjali SR , Simmons A , Clines GA , Sartiel A , Gatti RA , Chessa L , Sanal O , Lavin MF , Jaspers NG , Taylor AM , Arlett CF , Miki T , Weissman SM , Lovett M , Collins FS , Shiloh Y . A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science (1995) ;268: (5218):1749–53. |
[23] | Robertson AG , Kim J , Al-Ahmadie H , Bellmunt J , Guo G , Cherniack AD , Hinoue T , Laird PW , Hoadley KA , Akbani R , Castro MAA , Gibb EA , Kanchi RS , Gordenin DA , Shukla SA , Sanchez-Vega F , Hansel DE , Czerniak BA , Reuter VE , Su X , de Sa Carvalho B , Chagas VS , Mungall KL , Sadeghi S , Pedamallu CS , Lu Y , Klimczak LJ , Zhang J , Choo C , Ojesina AI , Bullman S , Leraas KM , Lichtenberg TM , Wu CJ , Schultz N , Getz G , Meyerson M , Mills GB , McConkey DJ , Network TR , Weinstein JN , Kwiatkowski DJ , Lerner SP . Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cell (2017) ;171: (3):540–56 e25. |
[24] | Zehir A , Benayed R , Shah RH , Syed A , Middha S , Kim HR , Srinivasan P , Gao J , Chakravarty D , Devlin SM , Hellmann MD , Barron DA , Schram AM , Hameed M , Dogan S , Ross DS , Hechtman JF , DeLair DF , Yao J , Mandelker DL , Cheng DT , Chandramohan R , Mohanty AS , Ptashkin RN , Jayakumaran G , Prasad M , Syed MH , Rema AB , Liu ZY , Nafa K , Borsu L , Sadowska J , Casanova J , Bacares R , Kiecka IJ , Razumova A , Son JB , Stewart L , Baldi T , Mullaney KA , Al-Ahmadie H , Vakiani E , Abeshouse AA , Penson AV , Jonsson P , Camacho N , Chang MT , Won HH , Gross BE , Kundra R , Heins ZJ , Chen HW , Phillips S , Zhang H , Wang J , Ochoa A , Wills J , Eubank M , Thomas SB , Gardos SM , Reales DN , Galle J , Durany R , Cambria R , Abida W , Cercek A , Feldman DR , Gounder MM , Hakimi AA , Harding JJ , Iyer G , Janjigian YY , Jordan EJ , Kelly CM , Lowery MA , Morris LGT , Omuro AM , Raj N , Razavi P , Shoushtari AN , Shukla N , Soumerai TE , Varghese AM , Yaeger R , Coleman J , Bochner B , Riely GJ , Saltz LB , Scher HI , Sabbatini PJ , Robson ME , Klimstra DS , Taylor BS , Baselga J , Schultz N , Hyman DM , Arcila ME , Solit DB , Ladanyi M , Berger MF . Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nature Medicine (2017) ;23: (6):703–13. |
[25] | Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Kandoth C , Schultz N , Cherniack AD , Akbani R , Liu Y , Shen H , Robertson AG , Pashtan I , Shen R , Benz CC , Yau C , Laird PW , Ding L , Zhang W , Mills GB , Kucherlapati R , Mardis ER , Levine DA . Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature (2013) ;497: (7447):67–73. |
[26] | Lynch HT , Smyrk TC , Watson P , Lanspa SJ , Lynch JF , Lynch PM , Cavalieri RJ , Boland CR . Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: An updated review. Gastroenterology (1993) ;104: (5):1535–49. |
[27] | Kouraklis G , Misiakos EP . Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome): Criteria for identification and management. Dig Dis Sci (2005) ;50: (2):336–44. |
[28] | Carlo MI , Zhang L , Mandelker D , Vijai J , Cipolla CK , Robson ME , Funt S , Hakimi AA , Iyer G , Rosenberg JE , Coleman J , Solit DB , Offit K , Bajorin D . Cancer predisposing germline mutations in patients (pts) with urothelial cancer (UC) of the renal pelvis (R-P), ureter (U) and bladder (B). Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; June 2-6, 2017; Chicago, IL2017. p. abstract 4510. |
[29] | Lacks SA , Dunn JJ , Greenberg B . Identification of base mismatches recognized by the heteroduplex-DNA-repair system of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Cell (1982) ;31: (2 Pt 1):327–36. |
[30] | Lahue RS , Au KG , Modrich P . DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science (1989) ;245: (4914):160–4. |
[31] | Le DT , Uram JN , Wang H , Bartlett BR , Kemberling H , Eyring AD , Skora AD , Luber BS , Azad NS , Laheru D , Biedrzycki B , Donehower RC , Zaheer A , Fisher GA , Crocenzi TS , Lee JJ , Duffy SM , Goldberg RM , de la Chapelle A , Koshiji M , Bhaijee F , Huebner T , Hruban RH , Wood LD , Cuka N , Pardoll DM , Papadopoulos N , Kinzler KW , Zhou S , Cornish TC , Taube JM , Anders RA , Eshleman JR , Vogelstein B , Diaz LA Jr . PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine (2015) ;372: (26):2509–20. |
[32] | Le DT , Durham JN , Smith KN , Wang H , Bartlett BR , Aulakh LK , Lu S , Kemberling H , Wilt C , Luber BS , Wong F , Azad NS , Rucki AA , Laheru D , Donehower R , Zaheer A , Fisher GA , Crocenzi TS , Lee JJ , Greten TF , Duffy AG , Ciombor KK , Eyring AD , Lam BH , Joe A , Kang SP , Holdhoff M , Danilova L , Cope L , Meyer C , Zhou S , Goldberg RM , Armstrong DK , Bever KM , Fader AN , Taube J , Housseau F , Spetzler D , Xiao N , Pardoll DM , Papadopoulos N , Kinzler KW , Eshleman JR , Vogelstein B , Anders RA , Diaz LA Jr . Mismatch-repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science (2017) . |
[33] | Zhao H , Thienpont B , Yesilyurt BT , Moisse M , Reumers J , Coenegrachts L , Sagaert X , Schrauwen S , Smeets D , Matthijs G , Aerts S , Cools J , Metcalf A , Spurdle A , Anecs, Amant F , Lambrechts D . Mismatch repair deficiency endows tumors with a unique mutation signature and sensitivity to DNA double-strand breaks. eLife (2014) ;3: :e02725. |
[34] | Hause RJ , Pritchard CC , Shendure J , Salipante SJ . Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types. Nature Medicine (2016) ;22: (11):1342–50. |
[35] | Kassem HS , Varley JM , Hamam SM , Margison GP . Immunohistochemical analysis of expression and allelotype of mismatch repair genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2) in bladder cancer. Br J Cancer (2001) ;84: (3):321–8. |
[36] | Kawakami T , Shiina H , Igawa M , Deguchi M , Nakajima K , Ogishima T , Tokizane T , Urakami S , Enokida H , Miura K , Ishii N , Kane CJ , Carroll PR , Dahiya R . Inactivation of the hMSH3 mismatch repair gene in bladder cancer. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (2004) ;325: (3):934–42. |
[37] | Sturtevant AH . A highly specific complementary lethal system in drosophila melanogaster. Genetics (1956) ;41: (1):118–23. |
[38] | Lucchesi JC . Synthetic lethality and semi-lethality among functionally related mutants of Drosophila melanfgaster. Genetics (1968) ;59: (1):37–44. |
[39] | Brough R , Frankum JR , Costa-Cabral S , Lord CJ , Ashworth A . Searching for synthetic lethality in cancer. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development (2011) ;21: (1):34–41. |
[40] | Fong PC , Yap TA , Boss DS , Carden CP , Mergui-Roelvink M , Gourley C , De Greve J , Lubinski J , Shanley S , Messiou C , A’Hern R , Tutt A , Ashworth A , Stone J , Carmichael J , Schellens JH , de Bono JS , Kaye SB . Poly (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibition: Frequent durable responses in BRCA carrier ovarian cancer correlating with platinum-free interval. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2010) ;28: (15):2512–9. |
[41] | Lee JM , Hays JL , Annunziata CM , Noonan AM , Minasian L , Zujewski JA , Yu M , Gordon N , Ji J , Sissung TM , Figg WD , Azad N , Wood BJ , Doroshow J , Kohn EC . Phase I/Ib study of olaparib and carboplatin in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-associated breast or ovarian cancer with biomarker analyses. Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2014) ;106: (6):dju089. |
[42] | Kaufman B , Shapira-Frommer R , Schmutzler RK , Audeh MW , Friedlander M , Balmana J , Mitchell G , Fried G , Stemmer SM , Hubert A , Rosengarten O , Steiner M , Loman N , Bowen K , Fielding A , Domchek SM . Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2015) ;33: (3):244–50. |
[43] | Farmer H , McCabe N , Lord CJ , Tutt AN , Johnson DA , Richardson TB , Santarosa M , Dillon KJ , Hickson I , Knights C , Martin NM , Jackson SP , Smith GC , Ashworth A . Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature (2005) ;434: (7035):917–21. |
[44] | Teo MY , Bambury RM , Zabor EC , Jordan E , Al-Ahmadie H , Boyd ME , Bouvier N , Mullane SA , Cha EK , Roper N , Ostrovnaya I , Hyman DM , Bochner BH , Arcila ME , Solit DB , Berger MF , Bajorin DF , Bellmunt J , Iyer G , Rosenberg JE . DNA damage response and repair gene alterations are associated with improved survival in patients with platinum-treated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research (2017) ;23: (14):3610–8. |
[45] | Desai NB , Scott SN , Zabor EC , Cha EK , Hreiki J , Sfakianos JP , Ramirez R , Bagrodia A , Rosenberg JE , Bajorin DF , Berger MF , Bochner BH , Zelefsky MJ , Kollmeier MA , Ostrovnaya I , Al-Ahmadie HA , Solit DB , Iyer G . Genomic characterization of response to chemoradiation in urothelial bladder cancer. Cancer (2016) ;122: (23):3715–23. |
[46] | Landrum MJ , Lee JM , Benson M , Brown G , Chao C , Chitipiralla S , Gu B , Hart J , Hoffman D , Hoover J , Jang W , Katz K , Ovetsky M , Riley G , Sethi A , Tully R , Villamarin-Salomon R , Rubinstein W , Maglott DR . ClinVar: Public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Research (2016) ;44: (D1):D862–8. |
[47] | Strathdee G , MacKean MJ , Illand M , Brown R . A role for methylation of the hMLH1 promoter in loss of hMLH1 expression and drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Oncogene (1999) ;18: (14):2335–41. |
[48] | Sawant A , Kothandapani A , Zhitkovich A , Sobol RW , Patrick SM . Role of mismatch repair proteins in the processing of cisplatin interstrand cross-links. DNA Repair (2015) ;35: :126–36. |
[49] | Fink D , Nebel S , Aebi S , Zheng H , Cenni B , Nehme A , Christen RD , Howell SB . The role of DNA mismatch repair in platinum drug resistance. Cancer Research (1996) ;56: (21):4881–6. |
[50] | Drummond JT , Anthoney A , Brown R , Modrich P . Cisplatin and adriamycin resistance are associated with MutLalpha and mismatch repair deficiency in an ovarian tumor cell line. The Journal of Biological Chemistry (1996) ;271: (33):19645–8. |
[51] | Van Allen EM , Miao D , Schilling B , Shukla SA , Blank C , Zimmer L , Sucker A , Hillen U , Geukes Foppen MH , Goldinger SM , Utikal J , Hassel JC , Weide B , Kaehler KC , Loquai C , Mohr P , Gutzmer R , Dummer R , Gabriel S , Wu CJ , Schadendorf D , Garraway LA . Genomic correlates of response to CTLA4 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Science (2015) . |
[52] | Snyder A , Makarov V , Merghoub T , Yuan J , Zaretsky JM , Desrichard A , Walsh LA , Postow MA , Wong P , Ho TS , Hollmann TJ , Bruggeman C , Kannan K , Li Y , Elipenahli C , Liu C , Harbison CT , Wang L , Ribas A , Wolchok JD , Chan TA . Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine (2014) ;371: (23):2189–99. |
[53] | McGranahan N , Furness AJ , Rosenthal R , Ramskov S , Lyngaa R , Saini SK , Jamal-Hanjani M , Wilson GA , Birkbak NJ , Hiley CT , Watkins TB , Shafi S , Murugaesu N , Mitter R , Akarca AU , Linares J , Marafioti T , Henry JY , Van Allen EM , Miao D , Schilling B , Schadendorf D , Garraway LA , Makarov V , Rizvi NA , Snyder A , Hellmann MD , Merghoub T , Wolchok JD , Shukla SA , Wu CJ , Peggs KS , Chan TA , Hadrup SR , Quezada SA , Swanton C . Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Science (2016) ;351: (6280):1463–9. |
[54] | Rizvi NA , Hellmann MD , Snyder A , Kvistborg P , Makarov V , Havel JJ , Lee W , Yuan J , Wong P , Ho TS , Miller ML , Rekhtman N , Moreira AL , Ibrahim F , Bruggeman C , Gasmi B , Zappasodi R , Maeda Y , Sander C , Garon EB , Merghoub T , Wolchok JD , Schumacher TN , Chan TA . Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science (2015) ;348: (6230):124–8. |
[55] | Rooney MS , Shukla SA , Wu CJ , Getz G , Hacohen N . Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity. Cell (2015) ;160: (1-2):48–61. |
[56] | Rajasagi M , Shukla SA , Fritsch EF , Keskin DB , DeLuca D , Carmona E , Zhang W , Sougnez C , Cibulskis K , Sidney J , Stevenson K , Ritz J , Neuberg D , Brusic V , Gabriel S , Lander ES , Getz G , Hacohen N , Wu CJ . Systematic identification of personal tumor-specific neoantigens in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood (2014) ;124: (3):453–62. |
[57] | Rosenberg JE , Hoffman-Censits J , Powles T , van der Heijden MS , Balar AV , Necchi A , Dawson N , O’Donnell PH , Balmanoukian A , Loriot Y , Srinivas S , Retz MM , Grivas P , Joseph RW , Galsky MD , Fleming MT , Petrylak DP , Perez-Gracia JL , Burris HA , Castellano D , Canil C , Bellmunt J , Bajorin D , Nickles D , Bourgon R , Frampton GM , Cui N , Mariathasan S , Abidoye O , Fine GD , Dreicer R . Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: A single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet (2016) ;387: (10031):1909–20. |
[58] | Sharma P , Callahan MK , Bono P , Kim J , Spiliopoulou P , Calvo E , Pillai RN , Ott PA , de Braud F , Morse M , Le DT , Jaeger D , Chan E , Harbison C , Lin CS , Tschaika M , Azrilevich A , Rosenberg JE . Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CheckMate 032): A multicentre, open-label, two-stage, multi-arm, phase 1/2 trial. The Lancet Oncology (2016) ;17: (11):1590–8. |
[59] | Plimack ER , Bellmunt J , Gupta S , Berger R , Montgomery RB , Heath K , Juco J , Emancipator K , Kumudu P , Lunceford JK , Perini RF , O’donnell PH , editors. Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) for advanced urothelial cancer: Updated results and biomarker analysis from KEYNOTE-012. Annual Meeting of the American Socieity for Clinical Oncology; 2015 2015; Chicago, IL. |
[60] | Massard C , Gordon MS , Sharma S , Rafii S , Wainberg ZA , Luke J , Curiel TJ , Colon-Otero G , Hamid O , Sanborn RE , O’Donnell PH , Drakaki A , Tan W , Kurland JF , Rebelatto MC , Jin X , Blake-Haskins JA , Gupta A , Segal NH . Safety and efficacy of durvalumab (MEDI4736), an anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2016) ;34: (26):3119–25. |
[61] | Powles T , Eder JP , Fine GD , Braiteh FS , Loriot Y , Cruz C , Bellmunt J , Burris HA , Petrylak DP , Teng SL , Shen X , Boyd Z , Hegde PS , Chen DS , Vogelzang NJ . MPDLA (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer. Nature (2014) ;515: (7528):558–62. |
[62] | Gao J , Aksoy BA , Dogrusoz U , Dresdner G , Gross B , Sumer SO , Sun Y , Jacobsen A , Sinha R , Larsson E , Cerami E , Sander C , Schultz N . Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Science Signaling (2013) ;6: (269):pl1. |
[63] | Cerami E , Gao J , Dogrusoz U , Gross BE , Sumer SO , Aksoy BA , Jacobsen A , Byrne CJ , Heuer ML , Larsson E , Antipin Y , Reva B , Goldberg AP , Sander C , Schultz N . The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discovery (2012) ;2: (5):401–4. |