Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Selected papers of the 5th International Symposium on Mechanobiology of Cartilage and Chondrocyte, Athens, May 2007
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Summers, Garry C. | Merrill, Alison | Sharif, Mohammed | Adams, Michael A.
Affiliations: Department of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Michael A. Adams, BSc, PhD, Department of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK. Tel.: +44 117 9288363; E-mail: M.A.Adams@bris.ac.uk.
Abstract: Articular cartilage swells when its collagen network is degraded, both in osteoarthritis (OA) and following mechanical trauma. However, most of the experimental evidence actually shows that it is small excised samples of cartilage that swell, implying that the cartilage was not greatly swollen in-situ before it was excised. We hypothesise that degraded cartilage can be prevented from swelling in-situ by restraint from adjacent normal cartilage and subchondral bone. Four adjacent osteochondral specimens, 20×20 mm, were obtained from regions of the humeral heads of each of 11 skeletally-mature cows. The central region of each specimen was injured by compressive loading using a 9 mm-diameter flat metal indenter, and cartilage surface damage was confirmed using Indian ink. Damaged cartilage was allowed to swell in physiological saline for 1 h under one of four conditions of restraint: (A) normal in-situ restraint from subchondral bone and surrounding cartilage, (B) restraint from bone only, (C) restraint from cartilage only, (D) no restraint (excised specimen). Cartilage hydration was assessed by freeze-drying to constant weight. Proteoglycan loss from damaged cartilage was quantified by analyzing the GAG content of the surrounding bath using the DMB assay. Hydration of damaged cartilage after swelling depended on restraint (p<0.001), averaging: (A) 76.8%, (B) 78.2%, (C) 78.0%, (D) 81.3%. GAG loss following cartilage surface damage was insufficient to explain observed differences in hydration. The 6% increase in hydration between (A) and (D) can be attributed to swelling which is prohibited when the cartilage remains in-situ. Swelling of degraded cartilage can be largely prevented if it remains in-situ, supported by adjacent healthy bone and cartilage. Adverse physico-chemical consequences of cartilage degradation and swelling may become apparent only when this support is diminished, either because the affected region is large, or following deterioration of adjacent bone or cartilage.
Keywords: Articular cartilage, swelling, restrain, damage, in vitro
DOI: 10.3233/BIR-2008-0495
Journal: Biorheology, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 365-374, 2008
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl