Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Subtitle: A comparison with the cone-in-cone viscometer data and those of Copley1
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Dintenfass, Leopold
Affiliations: Haemorheology Unit and Medical Research, Sydney Hospital, and Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
Note: [1] Note from Editors-in-Chief with the author’s agreement: Since in the experiments described some of the data showed a recovery slow enough to be observable, while in other experiments no hysteresis could be observed, although the latter phenomenon is commonly called “shear thinning”, the term “thixotropy” is used throughout the present paper.
Abstract: Blood viscosity of 125 healthy men in the age group of 45–55 yr was studied by means of the rhombospheroid viscometer on EDTA blood at 37°C. These data are compared with the 1966 results of Dintenfass, Julian and Miller (Am. Heart J. 71 (1966), 687) and results of Dintenfass (Circ. Res. 11 (1962), 233) obtained by means of the cone-in-cone viscometer on freshly shed not anticoagulated blood; and with the data of Copley (Biorheology 10 (1973), 87) and Copley and King (Biorheology 10 (1973), 17) (and also of Merrill (J. appl. Physiol. 18 (1963), 255). All these data superimpose at shear rates above 0.4 sec−1. At medium and low shear rates the rhombospheroid data present a better fit with the Copley and King (Biorheology 10 (1973), 17) data than the early results obtained by means of the cone-in-cone viscometer. At high shear rates results obtained by GDM, cone-in-cone (Dintenfass, Julian and Miller, Am. Heart J. 71 (1966), 687), rhombospheroid and Weissenberg viscometers are nearly identical.
DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1974-11602
Journal: Biorheology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 397-403, 1974
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl