Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Reyes, M.J.D. | Oshida, Y.; | Andres, C.J. | Barco, T. | Hovijitra, S. | Brown, D.
Affiliations: University of the East, College of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Claro M. Recto, Manila Metro‐Manila, Philippines | Dental Materials division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1121 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5186, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author: Yoshiki Oshida, PhD, Professor, Dental Materials, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1121 Wets Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202‐5186, USA. Tel.: +1 317 274 3725; Fax: +1 317 274 2415; E‐mail: yoshida@iupui.edu.
Abstract: During its development, titanium was found to be incompatible with conventional dental porcelains due to weak bond strength brought about by titanium's high yet oxidative nature. In spite of the development of new low‐fusing porcelains designed for titanium application, previous studies have shown that sandblasting pre‐treatment prior to porcelain application led to weakening of the metal–ceramic bonding. The aim of this study is to search for an effective alternative to sandblasting for the surface treatment of the titanium substrate in the titanium–porcelain system. The research evaluated the bond strength of 165 samples of titanium–porcelain systems divided into 11 groups. A three‐point flexural bend test was conducted to measure the force required to fracture the porcelain on the titanium substrate. A correlation between the type of surface treatment and the bond strengths of each group was evaluated if it resulted to significant differences. The study found significantly differences in the energy‐to‐break of titanium–porcelain systems treated with hydrochloric acid and sandblasting compared with the control group. The bonds strength achieved by the titanium–porcelain system when treated with hydrochloric acid is comparable to that of conventional metal–ceramic alloy system. Hydrochloric acid treatment of the titanium substrate is a promising alternative to sandblasting for the surface treatment of the titanium substrate in the titanium–porcelain system.
Keywords: Titanium, porcelain, sandblasting, shot‐peening, acid treatment, bond strengths
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 117-136, 2001
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl