Simulation of tibial counterface wear in mobile bearing knees with uncoated and ADLC coated surfaces

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Jones, V.C. | Barton, D.C. | Auger, D.D. | Hardaker, C. | Stone, M.H. | Fisher, J.^;

Affiliations: Medical and Biological Engineering Group, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK | DePuy International Ltd., Leeds, LS11 8DT, UK | Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK

Note: [] Corresponding author. Tel.: +44113 2332128; E‐mail: j.fisher@leeds.ac.uk.

Abstract: A multidirectional pin‐on‐plate reciprocating machine was used to compare the wear performance of UHMWPE sliding against cast cobalt chrome (CoCr) plates that were either untreated or coated with Amorphous Diamond Like Carbon (ADLC). The test conditions were based on a 1/5 scale model representative of in vivo motion at the tibial counterfaces of unconstrained mobile bearing knees [1]. The average ± STERR wear rates were 13.78 ± 1.06 mm3/Mcycles for the ADLC counterfaces and 0.504 ± 0.12 mm3/Mcycles for the control CoCr counterfaces. All of the pins run on the ADLC counterfaces exhibited the same patterns of blistering along the central axis, and severe abrasion elsewhere to the extent that all of the original machining marks were removed after just one week of testing. The average value of friction coefficient was 0.24 for the ADLC counterfaces and 0.073 for the control CoCr counterfaces. The factor of 3.5 increase was statistically significant at p<0.05. In the tribological evaluation of ADLC coatings for tibial trays in mobile bearing knees, this study shows that this specific Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) ADLC showed significantly poorer frictional and wear performance than uncoated surfaces which was sufficient to negate any potential benefits of improved resistance to third body damage.

Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 105-115, 2001