Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Kang, Kyoung-Taka; * | Kim, Sung-Hwanb; * | Son, Juhyuna | Lee, Young Hanc | Koh, Yong-Gond; **
Affiliations: [a] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea | [b] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, Republic of Korea | [c] Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Medical Convergence Research Institute, and Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea | [d] Joint Reconstruction Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei Sarang Hospital, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 06698, Republic of Korea
Correspondence: [**] Corresponding author: Yong-Gon Koh, Joint Reconstruction Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei Sarang Hospital, 10 Hyoryeong-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06698, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82-2-2023-5541; Fax: +82-2-2023-5597; E-mail: osygkoh@gmail.com.
Note: [*] Kyoung-Tak Kang and Sung-Hwan Kim contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
Abstract: Background:Computational models have been identified as efficient techniques in the clinical decision-making process. However, computational model was validated using published data in most previous studies, and the kinematic validation of such models still remains a challenge. Recently, studies using medical imaging have provided a more accurate visualization of knee joint kinematics. Objective:The purpose of the present study was to perform kinematic validation for the subject-specific computational knee joint model by comparison with subject’s medical imaging under identical laxity condition. Methods:The laxity test was applied to the anterior-posterior drawer under 90° flexion and the varus–valgus under 20° flexion with a series of stress radiographs, a Telos device, and computed tomography. The loading condition in the computational subject-specific knee joint model was identical to the laxity test condition in the medical image. Results:Our computational model showed knee laxity kinematic trends that were consistent with the computed tomography images, except for negligible differences because of the indirect application of the subject’s in vivo material properties. Conclusions:Medical imaging based on computed tomography with the laxity test allowed us to measure not only the precise translation but also the rotation of the knee joint. This methodology will be beneficial in the validation of laxity tests for subject- or patient-specific computational models.
Keywords: 3D imaging, computed tomography, computer simulation, knee joint, laxity test
DOI: 10.3233/BME-171686
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 417-429, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl