Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Selected Papers from the 5th China–France International Symposium “Stem Cells: From Bench to Bedside”, 12–14 December 2013, Kunming, China
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Guan, Zheng; | Shi, Songtao | Samruajbenjakun, Buncha | Kamolmatyakul, Suttatip;
Affiliations: Prince of Songkla University, Preventive Dentistry, Hadyai, Songkhla, Thailand | Biomedical Research Center, The First People's Hospital of Kunming, Yunnan, China | University of Southern California, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Associate Professor Suttatip Kamolmatyakul, D.Sc.D., Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hadyai, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand. Tel.: +66 74 287510, Fax: +66 74 212922; E-mail: suttatip.k@psu.ac.th
Abstract: Chitosan has been used as scaffolds with various methods of fabrication including expensive commercial available ones for tissue engineering. The objective of this study is to assemble our novel method of chitosan scaffold fabrication in economical and uncomplicated way that suitable for dental pulp stem cell (DPSC) and stem cells of human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). Chitosan scaffolds (2% and 3%) were fabricated in an uncomplicated procedure, including centrifugation and freeze-drying steps. The chitosan scaffolds were compared and the pore size, swelling and degradation were assessed. In addition, the cytocompatibility was assessed of chitosan scaffolds seeded with DPSC and SHED. The pore size of 2% and 3% chitosan scaffolds were similar being 188.71±51.90 μm and 195.30±67.21 μm, respectively. Swelling ratios of 3% chitosan scaffolds were significantly lower than those of 2% chitosan scaffolds. Dimension of scaffolds changed in first 5 minutes. After that, those scaffolds could maintain their dimension. Chitosan scaffolds degraded as from day 7. No differences were found between 2% and 3% chitosan scaffolds. The scaffolds were shown to be non-toxic and to promote DPSCs and SHED growth. The viability of DPSCs and SHED on 2% scaffolds proved to be higher than that of the 3% scaffold group. This study suggested that chitosan scaffolds fabricated with our novel method were suitable for the growth and survival of DPSC and SHED.
Keywords: Biocompatibility, cell culture, chitosan scaffold, dental-derived stem cell
DOI: 10.3233/BME-141231
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 25, no. s1, pp. 121-135, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl