Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Includes Special Section: Abstracts from the Joint Meeting of the FESN/GNP, Sept. 12-14, 2013, Berlin, Germany
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Aimola, Lina | Schindler, Igor | Venneri, Annalena
Affiliations: Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Durham, Durham, UK | Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK | Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospital, Sheffield, UK and San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Dr. Igor Schindler, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. Tel.: +44 1482 465563; Fax: +44 1482 465599; E-mail: i.schindler@hull.ac.uk
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Patients with unilateral neglect may show line bisection errors selectively in either near (within hand reaching) or far (beyond hand reaching) space which suggests that these two spatial areas are coded differently by the brain. This exploratory study investigated, whether any difference in performance between these spatial domains might be task-independent or modulated by the requirement for a motor response. METHODS: A 31-year-old right brain damaged patient (MF) and a group of age matched healthy controls were assessed with two serial visual search tasks and a Landmark paradigm. Both types of task required either a directional (pointing) or non-directional (button press) motor response. Participants were assessed with both task types and response modes in near (57 cm) and far space (114 cm). RESULTS: MF showed left neglect during visual search only in far space for the perceptual condition and in near space for the motor condition. MF showed no neglect in both versions of the Landmark task irrespective of spatial distance. A voxel-based morphometric assessment of MF's brain lesion showed marked damage in the right ventro-temporal cortex, superior temporal gyrus, insula, inferior frontal gyrus, angular gyrus and bilaterally in the posterior cingulate cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest that processing of far space during visual search is associated with ventral stream damage but only when space is coded through visual information. Neglect involving directional motor activity in near space seems to be associated with damage of structures sharing close connections with the dorsal stream.
Keywords: Spatial neglect, distance, line bisection, visual search, MRI, VBM
DOI: 10.3233/BEN-2012-110243
Journal: Behavioural Neurology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 245-257, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl