Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Rengarajan, Priya | Poonguzhali, I. | Malarvizhi, E. | Mahendran, K.; *
Affiliations: Saveetha Engineering College, Thandalam, Chennai – 602105, India | Panimalar Institute of Technology, Chennai, India | St. Joseph’sCollege of Engineering, Chennai – 600119, India
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding Author. mahendrank@saveetha.ac.in
Abstract: The use of wireless sensor networks (WSNs), in several sectors, including communication, agriculture, manufacturing, smart health, monitoring and surveillance is increasing in R&D. An IoT-based WSN in agricultural production has been effective in detecting yield conditions and automating agriculture precision by using multiple sensors. To collect data on crops, plants, temperature estimates and stickiness as well as to boost yields by making smart agriculture decisions, they are deployed in rural regions. Sensors, on the other hand, are constrained by their inability to handle, store, communicate, and process large amounts of data due to a lack of available resources. Additionally, the safety and security of the IoT-based agricultural sensors against damaging competitors are crucial factors, as is their efficacy. One idea put up in this article is to employ a WSN structure based on the Internet of Things (IoT) for smart agriculture. The selection of group leaders is also based on data collected by rural sensors and multi-rules choice capacity. A transmission link’s SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) is used to gauge the intensity of signals being sent over it in order to guarantee accurate and timely data transfer. In addition, the direct congruential generator is repeated in order to enable data flow from agricultural sensors to central stations (BS). Compared with previous arrangements, smart agriculture obtained an average of 13.5 percent in the organisation throughput, 38.5 percent in the parcel drop percentage, 13.5 percent in the organisation inactivity, and 16 percent in energy usage. Comparatively speaking, this is a huge step forward.
Keywords: Wireless sensor networks, signal noise ratio, Internet of Things, network latency
DOI: 10.3233/AJW230069
Journal: Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 87-93, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl