Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mário de Oliveira Rodrigues, Cleytona; b; * | Bezerra, Camilab | Freitas, Fredb | Oliveira, Italoc
Affiliations: [a] University of Pernambuco, Garanhuns-PE, Brazil. E-mail: cleyton.rodrigues@upe.br | [b] Center of Informatics, Federal University or Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. E-mails: camila.bezerra.br@gmail.com, fred@cin.ufpe.br | [c] Center of Legal Sciences, Federal University or Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. E-mail: italojsoliveira1@gmail.com
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. E-mail: cleyton.rodrigues@upe.br.
Note: [] Accepted by: Chris Partridge
Abstract: Whereas ordinary legal documents are deployed as text documents for human consumption, AI & Law focuses on tackling the challenges surrounding the development of legal ontologies to assign meaning to legal provisions. We have witnessed an explosion of legal domain (and application) ontologies loosely based on sustainable theories, harming reusability. Fortunately, foundational ontologies foster interoperability between these domain ontologies, providing context-independent concepts that are usable and reusable across multiple domains. In particular, legal ontologies require this “conciliation” with other foundational ontologies, given the inherent heterogeneity of the domain, such as the criminal domain. This paper describes a core legal ontology, built top-down from the UFO foundational ontology, engineered using the positivist legal theory of Hans Kelsen, fostering reusability across a plurality of the criminal field. The UFO proposal makes it possible to evaluate and leverage the conceptual quality of class hierarchies and concept taxonomies through stereotyped modeling primitives and constraints. The latter regulates how the primitives can be combined to support the design of ontologically well-founded conceptual models. This study was conducted to further highlight the depiction of Crimes of Omission, which have not yet been properly explored in the available literature. Although the conceptualization is tied directly to the Brazilian legal domain, it can be applied, with slight adaptations, to other legal systems around the world that follow the Roman-Germanic (or Civil Law) system and Kelsen’s legal theory. Through these ontologies, it is possible to perform lawsuit simulation, such as the identification of a crime and imposition of penalties. At the end of this paper, we detail these possibilities for future work.
Keywords: AI & Law, Legal Ontology, Criminal Domain, Foundational Ontology, Crimes of Omission
DOI: 10.3233/AO-200223
Journal: Applied Ontology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7-39, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl