Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: The Ontology of Functions
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Carrara, Massimiliano; | Garbacz, Pawel | Vermaas, Pieter E.
Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, University of Padua, Padova, Italy. E-mail: massimiliano.carrara@unipd.it | Department of Philosophy, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. E-mail: garbacz@kul.lublin.pl | Philosophy Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. E-mail: p.e.vermaas@tudelft.nl
Note: [] Corresponding author: Massimiliano Carrara, Department of Philosophy, University of Padua, Piazza Capitaniato 3, 35139 Padova, Italy. E-mail: massimiliano.carrara@unipd.it.
Abstract: In this paper we argue that the challenge of the formalization of functions not merely consists of analyzing and formalizing yet another concept; the challenge may also consist of formalizing a concept that is to be taken as a family resemblance concept in the Wittgensteinian sense. We focus on engineering for giving this argument and indicate briefly how the argument can also be given for biological functions. We demonstrate that in engineering there are a number of different meanings attached to the term “function”, and observe that engineers moreover seem to hold that having all these meanings is useful in their field. This observation make plausible that function indeed is to be taken as a family resemblance concept. Then we describe three strategies for the formalization of functions – the revisionary, the overarching and the descriptive strategies – and relate them to a number of the current proposals for this formalization. Assessing the strategies with the meta-ontological goals for formalizations of adequacy and minimality, we argue that if function indeed is to be taken as a family resemblance concept, then the descriptive strategy is to be preferred.
Keywords: Functions in engineering, family resemblance concepts, formalization strategies, minimality for ontologies, adequacy for ontologies
DOI: 10.3233/AO-2011-0090
Journal: Applied Ontology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 141-163, 2011
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl