Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, University of Graz, Austria
Note: [] Corresponding author: Dr. Josef Smolle, Division of Analytic‐Morphologic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University of Graz, Austria, Auenbruggerplatz 8, A‐8036 Graz, Austria. Tel.: +43 316 385/2530; Fax: +43 316 385/2466; E‐mail: josef.smolle@kfunigraz.ac.at.
Abstract: Aims. In tissue counter analysis (TCA) digital images of complex histologic sections are dissected into elements of equal size and shape, and digital information comprising grey level, colour and texture features is calculated for each element. In this study we assessed the feasibility of TCA for the quantitative description of amount and also of distribution of immunostained material. Methods. In a first step, our system was trained for differentiating between background and tissue on the one hand and between immunopositive and so‐called other tissue on the other. In a second step, immunostained slides were automatically screened and the procedure was tested for the quantitative description of amount of cytokeratin (CK) and leukocyte common antigen (LCA) immunopositive structures. Additionally, fractal analysis was applied to all cases describing the architectural distribution of immunostained material. Results. The procedure yielded reproducible assessments of the relative amounts of immunopositive tissue components when the number and percentage of CK and LCA stained structures was assessed. Furthermore, a reliable classification of immunopositive patterns was found by means of fractal dimensionality. Conclusions. Tissue counter analysis combined with classification trees and fractal analysis is a fully automated and reproducible approach for the quantitative description in immunohistology.
