Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mattfeldt, Torsten; | Wolter, Hubertus | Kemmerling, Ralf | Gottfried, Hans‐Werner | Kestler, Hans A.
Affiliations: Department of Pathology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany | Department of Medical Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany | Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany | Department of Neural Information Processing, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Note: [] Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. T. Mattfeldt, Department of Pathology, Oberer Eselsberg M23, D‐89081 Ulm, Germany. Fax: +49 731 58738; E‐mail: torsten.mattfeldt@medizin.uni‐ulm.de.
Abstract: Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a modern genetic method which enables a genome‐wide survey of chromosomal imbalances. For each chromosome region, one obtains the information whether there is a loss or gain of genetic material, or whether there is no change at that region. Usually it is not possible to evaluate all 46 chromosomes of a metaphase, therefore several (up to 20 or more) metaphases are analyzed per individual, and expressed as average. Mostly one does not study one individual alone but groups of 20–30 individuals. Therefore, large amounts of data quickly accumulate which must be put into a logical order. In this paper we present the application of a self‐organizing map (Genecluster) as a tool for cluster analysis of data from pT2N0 prostate cancer cases studied by CGH. Self‐organizing maps are artificial neural networks with the capability to form clusters on the basis of an unsupervised learning rule, i.e., in our examples it gets the CGH data as only information (no clinical data). We studied a group of 40 recent cases without follow‐up, an older group of 20 cases with follow‐up, and the data set obtained by pooling both groups. In all groups good clusterings were found in the sense that clinically similar cases were placed into the same clusters on the basis of the genetic information only. The data indicate that losses on chromosome arms 6q, 8p and 13q are all frequent in pT2N0 prostatic cancer, but the loss on 8p has probably the largest prognostic importance.
Keywords: Artificial neural networks, chromosome aberrations, cluster analysis, comparative genomic hybridization, multivariate analysis, prognostic factors, prostatic cancer, self‐organizing maps, tumor suppressor genes
Journal: Analytical Cellular Pathology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 29-37, 2001
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl